By D.M. Livingston

Published Oct 8, 2025

Waterbury, CT – The tragic deaths of Carlene Williams, 51, and Marc Adams, 55, in their Beverly Avenue home on October 6, 2025, have reignited local debate over the potential reinstatement of the death penalty in Connecticut. Their 25-year-old son, Javian Adams, has been charged with two counts of murder following the incident.

According to authorities, the incident appears to have stemmed from a domestic dispute over finances. Adams allegedly withdrew money from his mother’s account, escalating tensions that ended in fatal violence. Surveillance footage and witness statements indicate the argument turned deadly inside the family home.

Waterbury Crime Central – News & Updates

Adams has a documented history of domestic violence, including prior arrests for assault and strangulation, and was on probation at the time of the killings. He had also been discharged from court-ordered domestic violence counseling for nonattendance.

Double Homicide Breaking News

Case Study: Death Penalty Considerations
This case highlights the ongoing conversation about whether Connecticut should return the death penalty for the most extreme crimes. Advocates argue that cases involving premeditated murder within a family, combined with a pattern of prior violent behavior, exemplify the type of offense that could justify capital punishment. Critics, however, emphasize the need for mental health support, intervention programs, and broader systemic solutions to prevent domestic violence before it escalates to homicide.

The Adams case serves as a grim example for policymakers and the public, illustrating the devastating consequences of unchecked domestic violence and raising difficult questions about justice, accountability, and prevention in Connecticut.

Local law enforcement and community organizations continue to urge residents to recognize warning signs of domestic abuse and seek help when necessary. Organizations like Safe Haven provide confidential support and resources for those at risk.

As the legal process unfolds, this case will likely remain central in discussions about whether the death penalty could serve as a deterrent for extreme acts of familial violence in the state.