A quick guide for voters trying to understand the political lane in CT-05
By The Waterbury Times|Published Feb 20, 2026
Waterbury-Every election cycle in Connecticut’s 5th Congressional District — which includes Waterbury, Danbury, Meriden, and the Litchfield Hills — voters hear the word “progressive” thrown around.
But what does that actually mean here?
And more importantly: who has the progressive movement historically supported in CT-05?
Here’s a simple, non-insider guide to help you understand the political lane.
First — what does “progressive” mean in CT politics?
In Connecticut, “progressive” usually refers to candidates supported by:
- organized labor
- public-sector unions (especially teachers)
- criminal justice reform advocates
- healthcare access groups
- and the Working Families Party (WFP)
These groups tend to support candidates who push:
- higher wages
- expanded healthcare
- public education funding
- tenant protections
- and equity-focused policy
In CT-05, the WFP is often the clearest signal of who the progressive lane is behind.
🗺️ The CT-05 progressive timeline
Here’s how that lane has evolved over the last two decades:
🟦 2006–2012: Chris Murphy
Murphy flipped the district from Republican to Democrat in 2006.
At the time, he was viewed as a modern progressive voice — especially on:
- gun safety
- consumer protection
- healthcare reform
He later left the seat to run for U.S. Senate.
🟨 2012 primary: Chris Donovan
When Murphy vacated the seat, the progressive base initially rallied behind Donovan, then Speaker of the Connecticut House.
- He had strong labor backing
- And early support from the Working Families Party
He ultimately lost the Democratic primary, but represented the clearest progressive candidate in that race.
🟩 2013–2018: Elizabeth Esty
Esty won the seat and served three terms.
She was considered:
- a mainstream Democrat
- with some progressive policy alignment
But she was not viewed as the movement-progressive favorite in the way Donovan or later candidates would be.
🟪 2018–Present: Jahana Hayes
Waterbury Gets 1.7% of $10Million from Congresswoman Jahana Hayes ( Don’t worry we did the math for you )
After Esty stepped down, the progressive lane reopened.
In 2018:
- the Working Families Party
- teachers unions
- national progressive groups
all consolidated behind Jahana Hayes, a former National Teacher of the Year.
She defeated establishment-backed candidate Mary Glassman in the primary and has held the seat since.
📌 What this means for voters today
As of now:
👉 The organized progressive infrastructure in CT-05 has consistently aligned behind the sitting incumbent, Jahana Hayes.
What Did Rep. Jahana Hayes Actually Secure — and What Was Automatic?
That includes:
- Working Families Party support
- labor and teacher unions
- national progressive voter groups
Challengers can still emerge — and sometimes do — but they must build their own coalition if they want to compete in the progressive lane.
🧠 Why this matters in every election cycle
Understanding who progressives back matters because:
✔ It signals where grassroots organizing power is going
✔ It often predicts primary election outcomes
✔ It shapes the issues that dominate the campaign (education, housing, wages, justice reform)
In a district like CT-05 — where primaries often decide the winner — that lane can be decisive.
🗳️ Bottom line
Over the last 20 years, the progressive line in Connecticut’s 5th District has evolved like this:
➡️ Murphy → Donovan → Hayes
With Jahana Hayes currently holding the support of the district’s progressive coalition.
If you’re a voter in Waterbury or anywhere in CT-05, understanding this lane helps answer a key question every cycle:
👉 Not just who is running — but who has the movement behind them.

Leave a comment