Who Do “Progressives” Back in Connecticut’s 5th District?

A quick guide for voters trying to understand the political lane in CT-05

By The Waterbury Times|Published Feb 20, 2026

Waterbury-Every election cycle in Connecticut’s 5th Congressional District — which includes Waterbury, Danbury, Meriden, and the Litchfield Hills — voters hear the word “progressive” thrown around.

But what does that actually mean here?
And more importantly: who has the progressive movement historically supported in CT-05?

Here’s a simple, non-insider guide to help you understand the political lane.


First — what does “progressive” mean in CT politics?

In Connecticut, “progressive” usually refers to candidates supported by:

  • organized labor
  • public-sector unions (especially teachers)
  • criminal justice reform advocates
  • healthcare access groups
  • and the Working Families Party (WFP)

These groups tend to support candidates who push:

  • higher wages
  • expanded healthcare
  • public education funding
  • tenant protections
  • and equity-focused policy

In CT-05, the WFP is often the clearest signal of who the progressive lane is behind.


🗺️ The CT-05 progressive timeline

Here’s how that lane has evolved over the last two decades:


🟦 2006–2012: Chris Murphy

Murphy flipped the district from Republican to Democrat in 2006.

At the time, he was viewed as a modern progressive voice — especially on:

  • gun safety
  • consumer protection
  • healthcare reform

He later left the seat to run for U.S. Senate.


🟨 2012 primary: Chris Donovan

When Murphy vacated the seat, the progressive base initially rallied behind Donovan, then Speaker of the Connecticut House.

  • He had strong labor backing
  • And early support from the Working Families Party

He ultimately lost the Democratic primary, but represented the clearest progressive candidate in that race.


🟩 2013–2018: Elizabeth Esty

Esty won the seat and served three terms.

She was considered:

  • mainstream Democrat
  • with some progressive policy alignment

But she was not viewed as the movement-progressive favorite in the way Donovan or later candidates would be.


🟪 2018–Present: Jahana Hayes

Waterbury Gets 1.7% of $10Million from Congresswoman Jahana Hayes ( Don’t worry we did the math for you )

After Esty stepped down, the progressive lane reopened.

In 2018:

  • the Working Families Party
  • teachers unions
  • national progressive groups

all consolidated behind Jahana Hayes, a former National Teacher of the Year.

She defeated establishment-backed candidate Mary Glassman in the primary and has held the seat since.


📌 What this means for voters today

As of now:

👉 The organized progressive infrastructure in CT-05 has consistently aligned behind the sitting incumbent, Jahana Hayes.

What Did Rep. Jahana Hayes Actually Secure — and What Was Automatic?

That includes:

  • Working Families Party support
  • labor and teacher unions
  • national progressive voter groups

Challengers can still emerge — and sometimes do — but they must build their own coalition if they want to compete in the progressive lane.


🧠 Why this matters in every election cycle

Understanding who progressives back matters because:

✔ It signals where grassroots organizing power is going
✔ It often predicts primary election outcomes
✔ It shapes the issues that dominate the campaign (education, housing, wages, justice reform)

In a district like CT-05 — where primaries often decide the winner — that lane can be decisive.


🗳️ Bottom line

Over the last 20 years, the progressive line in Connecticut’s 5th District has evolved like this:

➡️ Murphy → Donovan → Hayes

With Jahana Hayes currently holding the support of the district’s progressive coalition.


If you’re a voter in Waterbury or anywhere in CT-05, understanding this lane helps answer a key question every cycle:

👉 Not just who is running — but who has the movement behind them.

Waterbury CT Local News